Question 1

What is business valuation, and why do the methods diverge?

Accepted Answer

Business valuation is the process of estimating a company's economic value — the price a willing buyer would pay a willing seller in an arms-length transaction. The three textbook methods (DCF, comparable multiples, comparable transactions) ask different questions and weigh different evidence. DCF asks: what are this company's projected future cash flows worth in today's dollars? Comparable multiples asks: what are similar companies trading at right now? Comparable transactions asks: what did similar deals actually clear at recently? When the methods diverge — and they routinely do by 2-3x — the spread is itself the insight. SaaS multiples can imply 10x revenue while DCF on the same projections shows 3x, both mathematically correct. The buyer leans on the lower one; the seller leans on the higher one; the negotiated price lands somewhere in between. Sources: McKinsey, Koller / Goedhart / Wessels, Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies; Aswath Damodaran (NYU Stern).

Question 2

When does each method apply?

Accepted Answer

DCF applies when you have a defensible multi-year projection — typically a maturing company with stable margins and predictable growth, where the inputs (growth rate, operating margin, discount rate, terminal growth) can be argued from data rather than wishful thinking. It's the dominant method in PE buyout modeling and corporate finance. Comparable multiples apply when you have a thick comparable set — public peers, recent private financings, or a vertical with active M&A. SaaS, e-commerce, and consumer brands have rich multiple data; deeply niche businesses don't. Comparable transactions apply when you have specific, recent, comparable deals — same industry, similar size, last 12-24 months. Used heavily in M&A advisory and IRS valuation work. The honest answer for most ranges: run all three, and let the convergence (or divergence) inform your confidence in any single number.

Question 3

What's a discount rate, and why does it matter so much?

Accepted Answer

The discount rate is the rate at which you discount future cash flows back to present value — it answers: a dollar in year 5 is worth how much today? In corporate finance the discount rate is typically the company's WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital), which blends the cost of debt and the cost of equity. For mid-cap private companies, 10-14% is typical; for early-stage VC-backed startups, 25-40%; for very stable public companies, 7-9%. The math is brutally sensitive to this input — a 200bps change in discount rate (12% → 10%) on a 5-year DCF can swing valuation by 25%+. This is why DCF skeptics complain it's 'garbage in, garbage out': the discount rate is often more art than science. Cross-check: pick a discount rate and see if it produces an LTV that aligns with what comparable multiples imply; if not, your discount rate is probably wrong. Source: McKinsey Valuation (5th ed.), Chapter 8.

Question 4

What's the difference between revenue multiple and EBITDA multiple?

Accepted Answer

A revenue multiple values the company at some multiple of trailing-12-month revenue (e.g. 5x revenue means a $20M-revenue company is worth $100M). An EBITDA multiple values it at some multiple of EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, Amortization) — typically 6x to 25x depending on industry and growth. Revenue multiples dominate in growth investing (high-growth SaaS, marketplaces) where most companies aren't yet profitable. EBITDA multiples dominate in mature businesses (manufacturing, professional services, mature SaaS) where profitability is the headline. The trap: revenue multiples ignore margin quality entirely — a $20M revenue business with 5% margins gets the same multiple as one with 30% margins, which is ridiculous when you're actually buying the cash flows. EBITDA multiples correct for that, but get distorted when EBITDA is artificially suppressed (heavy R&D, founder-comp adjustments). Best practice: triangulate — use revenue multiple as the headline, then verify with EBITDA multiple to catch margin-quality issues.

Question 5

Why are SaaS multiples so much higher than e-commerce or manufacturing?

Accepted Answer

Three structural reasons. First, gross margins: pure SaaS runs 70-85% gross margin; e-commerce 30-45%; manufacturing 20-35%. Higher gross margins mean each marginal dollar of revenue contributes more to operating profit, so a dollar of SaaS revenue is genuinely worth more than a dollar of e-commerce revenue. Second, recurring revenue: SaaS subscription revenue is sticky and predictable; e-commerce revenue resets every quarter as customers re-decide whether to repurchase. Predictable cash flows discount at lower rates, raising present value. Third, scalability: SaaS businesses have minimal incremental cost to serve a new customer; manufacturing has to build another factory at scale. The combined effect is that SaaS at 8x revenue isn't 'expensive' relative to manufacturing at 1.5x revenue — it's pricing in real economic differences. The cautionary version: when SaaS multiples crashed in 2022 (peak public SaaS multiples fell from 15x+ to 5-7x), the multiple compressed back toward fundamentals. Don't anchor on peak multiples.

Question 6

What's the terminal value in DCF, and why is it controversial?

Accepted Answer

Terminal value captures all cash flows beyond the explicit projection period, condensed into a single lump sum at the end of year N. The most common formulation (Gordon growth) is: TV = (final-year-cashflow × (1 + perpetual-growth-rate)) ÷ (discount-rate − perpetual-growth-rate). For a 5-year DCF, the terminal value typically represents 60-80% of the total valuation — meaning the bulk of your DCF value is in years that are explicitly NOT being modeled. This is why DCF skeptics call it 'a sophisticated way to dress up the perpetual growth assumption.' Three things to watch: (1) the perpetual growth rate must be ≤ long-run GDP growth (~2-3%); higher than that implies the company eventually consumes the entire economy. (2) The discount rate must be > the perpetual growth rate or the math is undefined (the calculator will throw an error). (3) Sensitivity: a 100bps change in perpetual growth rate can swing terminal value by 20%+. Best practice: report DCF with and without terminal value to expose how much depends on the perpetuity. Source: McKinsey Valuation, Chapter 12.

Question 7

How accurate are these multiples?

Accepted Answer

The multiples in this calculator are 2026-Q1 medians for $5M-$50M revenue companies, synthesized from Damodaran's NYU Stern industry database, SaaS Capital's annual private SaaS multiples report, and Pitchbook PE deal data. They're directionally correct for typical mid-market companies in each industry, but real-world variance is wide: a 'SaaS — High Growth' company can trade anywhere from 4x to 15x revenue depending on growth rate, gross margin, NRR, and market sentiment at the time of sale. The dataset refreshes annually (FIXME(annual-refresh) — track on the methodology page). For a real M&A decision, don't anchor on this calculator's median — pull the most recent comparable transactions, hire a banker who'll dig up the actual current market, and use this calculator as a first-pass sanity check. For early-stage planning ('what is my company roughly worth?'), the medians are a reasonable directional answer.

Question 8

Should I use one method or average them?

Accepted Answer

Don't average them mechanically — averaging hides the disagreement, which is the most useful information. Read them as a system. If all three methods cluster within 20% of each other, you have high confidence: that's the company's value. If they spread by 50%+, the buyer/seller gap is real and you need to pick a methodology consciously: buyers will demand the lowest, sellers will hold out for the highest, and the negotiation has to span the gap. Practitioner shorthand: present the median as the headline number, but always show the range and explain which method drives the high and the low. In M&A advisory, the dominant convention is 'comp transactions for the floor, DCF for the ceiling, multiples for the market check' — but reasonable advisors disagree. The calculator surfaces all three precisely because reducing them to one number obscures the most important strategic input.

Business Valuation Calculator

What this means

Worked example — $5M SaaS company at 30% growth

Frequently asked questions

Show the math